-
Website
http://www.simplemarriage.net/ -
Original page
http://www.simplemarriage.net/the-value-of-values.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Dave Peckens
1 comment · 1 points
-
iamthediva
1 comment · 1 points
-
DaphneandDonald
3 comments · 1 points
-
DoctorPsi
1 comment · 1 points
-
theburningor
5 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Thanks to the Love of my Wife
3 days ago · 17 comments
-
Blessings To You
1 day ago · 5 comments
-
Ask The Readers Free-For-All
1 week ago · 24 comments
-
Simple Marriage Giveaway: Union28 Apparel
2 weeks ago · 63 comments
-
Simple Marriage Resolution for 2010
3 days ago · 7 comments
-
Thanks to the Love of my Wife
Food for thought, thanks Tim!
There's a link at the bottom of this post http://www.adaringadventure.com/blog/wordpress/... if you're interested.
After that I was like "DUH! No WONDER I have been struggling with this issue. It's TOTALLY opposed to my core values." I sort of kind of maybe had an idea of what they were, but I never really understood just how IMPORTANT they were.
After that, the idea that value conflict can lead to a lot of marital conflict makes a TON of sense.
One values tolerance and the lack of an absolute right or wrong. The other values the idea of absolute truth and an agreed upon sense of right and wrong...what do you do in that case?
The idea of humbly considering one anothers' values is crucial. But the assertion that no value is better than the other is an argument that defeats itself...because the assertion is a value too.
To me, the better way is to work together in marriage to understand each others' values best enable us to love each other and our neighbors well...and seek to discover what new values will result from our union together.
What do you think?
I blog at www.burningbushes.org
@ Nicole - I'm not completely sure I understand what you're driving at, but I'll have a got at answering.
Yes there needs to be a level of tolerance and of course that can be described as a 'value.' I think it's unlikely that anybody would enter into a marriage where there was no tolerance because that would also intimate there was no respect either. Not saying it doesn't happen but it throws much of what I'm saying out of the window.
To say that no value is better than another, is not a value, it's simply a presupposition. Unless you accept that, then can you never look at other peoples values without judging them.
Why would someone think they would have the same values as their spouse? The two people don't have the same DNA, the same experiences, or come from the same family. To think a hub and a wife should have the same values sounds insecure to me. Can't I be good with my values and myself AND think my hub is ok with his? Now there are some deal breakers like if I value monogamy but he values the variety pack but unless the values contradict each other making life impossible, then knowing and learning from someone with different values as yours can help you grow up, I would think.
Tim, I was proud that you controlled your language on Corey's blog. You can talk about sex all you want here but no cussing! he he he ;-)
We do disagree on a lot of matters, but it would be boring to be married to myself, wouldn't it?
A principle is a truth - a fundamental belief - that lays the foundation for other truths. Principles shape our values. Values are the building blocks for principles. Values often change with cultural changes, whereas principles are timeless.
If my foundation is a belief that relationships have a purpose, and that purpose is to shape me into a better person, I’m going to value the experiences that push my growth. I may not like those experiences, but my principle belief will allow me to appreciate the opportunities to accomplish my purpose.
If my foundational principle is that relationships have no purpose other than to fulfill my wants and desires, I’m going to value changing partners in order to accomplish my purpose.
We are often uncomfortable when we encounter someone who not only knows his/her principles, can define the values that express those principles, and then live according to both!
@ Mary Ann - You know, I really don't get that at all. When I read Steve Pavlina's book I was the same way. The principles you talk of are concepts to my mind. There is no definitive 'Truth'. Not one that can be explained anyway. I prefer the Buddhist philosophy with this "If you can describe or explain truth then that isn't it"
OTOH, I'd love to read more and if you can point me in the right direction I would be grateful.
@ John - Firstly, in my experience not everybody does share the values you talk of, but that's beside the point.
If you are completely opposed on ALL major values, then I think it's unlikely you'd ever get married in the first place to be honest. I guess Corey is better qualified to answer that question than I am if I'm being honest.